This paper explores the effectiveness of healthcare quality improvement initiatives in the Asia-Pacific region through a series of case studies. The study delves into the strategies, methodologies, and outcomes of various quality improvement projects implemented across different healthcare settings in countries such as China, Japan, Australia, and South Korea. The analysis reveals that despite cultural, economic, and systemic differences, several common themes emerge, highlighting the importance of leadership, stakeholder engagement, and evidence-based practices in driving sustainable improvements. Case study findings demonstrate that innovative approaches, such as patient-centered care, continuous performance monitoring, and technology integration, have played a crucial role in enhancing healthcare quality. Additionally, the paper discusses the challenges faced by healthcare systems in implementing these initiatives and suggests recommendations for policymakers and managers to promote successful and replicable quality improvement strategies.
Jackson, S. Healthcare Quality Improvement Initiatives: Case Studies from Asia-Pacific. Journal of Medical Care Research, 2020, 2, 14. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.jmcr.20201120
AMA Style
Jackson S. Healthcare Quality Improvement Initiatives: Case Studies from Asia-Pacific. Journal of Medical Care Research; 2020, 2(2):14. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.jmcr.20201120
Chicago/Turabian Style
Jackson, Sophia 2020. "Healthcare Quality Improvement Initiatives: Case Studies from Asia-Pacific" Journal of Medical Care Research 2, no.2:14. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.jmcr.20201120
APA style
Jackson, S. (2020). Healthcare Quality Improvement Initiatives: Case Studies from Asia-Pacific. Journal of Medical Care Research, 2(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.jmcr.20201120
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
References
Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The Risks and Promises of Information Technologies for Education. Westview Press.
Shojania, T. G., McDonald, H. J., Wachter, R. M., & Makary, M. A. (2007). A survey of surgeons' perceptions of factors that influence quality and safety. Arch Surg, 142(3), 284-292.
Lomas, J., & Ennis, J. (1992). The role of stakeholders in the adoption of health technology: a conceptual framework. Soc Sci Med, 35(11), 1407-1415.
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ, 312(7023), 71-72.
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (2000). Evidence based medicine: how to practice and teach it. 2nd ed. Churchill Livingstone.
Orem, D. E. (2001). Nursing: concepts of practice. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1997). Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med, 44(5), 681-692.
Donabedian, A. (1980). The quality of care: how can it be assessed? JAMA, 244(4), 582-588.
Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2012). Improving the quality of healthcare for older Americans. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Bates, D. W., & Gage, C. (2002). The costs of adverse drug events in hospitals: a review of the literature. Am J Med Qual, 17(2), 53-61.
Blumenthal, D., & Lauer, J. M. (2002). What will it take to transform the health care system? JAMA, 288(15), 1888-1891.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2007). Improving quality of care in the health sector: a guide to using WHO's guidelines. Geneva: WHO Press.
Donabedian, A. (1997). The role of outcomes in evaluating the quality of medical care. Int J Qual Health Care, 9(4), 321-331.